Wednesday, May 6, 2009

MO sovereignty Bill stalled in Senate Committee

This was taken from the Ron Paul website. Self Explanatory. We need to call all of them especially the so-called Republican Sen. Shields
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/91870
``````````````````````````
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
MO sovereignty Bill stalled in Senate Committee. Update
Posted May 4th, 2009 by meekandmild
We want to see Missouri ’s own Sovereignty of States Resolution [HCR 13] passed. It’s already sailed through the House but is stuck in committee in the State Senate. We hope that our State Senators believe in the freedom of Missouri citizens to pass this resolution.”
UPDATE
Sen. Shields and ALL Republican and Democrat State Senators are blocking Rep. Jim Guest's sovereignty legislation; specifically HCR-13 (10th Amendment-State Sovereignty) and HB-361 (Federal Real ID Act of 2005).

Sen. Shields threatens a filibuster and will not allow these Bills to come out of the Rules Committee to the full Senate for a vote. The Senate has no right stopping this legislation to protect citizens of the state.

CALL THESE MEMBERS OF THE RULES COMMITTEE:

Kevin Engler, (R) Chairman - (573) 756-5572 kevin.engler@senate.mo.gov

Gary Nodler, (R) Vice-Chair - (573) 751-2306 gary_nodler@senate.mo.gov

Joan Bray - (D) (573) 751-2514 jbray@senate.mo.gov

Norma Champion - (R) (573) 751-2583 normachampion@senate.mo.gov

Timothy Green - (D) (573) 751-2420 timothy_green@senate.mo.gov

Charlie Shields - (R) (573) 751-9476 charlie_shields@senate.mo.gov

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

WHAT ??? have we really sunken so low that even the working girls are OK with taxes

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-prostitution-tax8-2009apr08,0,3766782.story

Never have visited one so I should be in favor of this since it does not impact me RIGHT ????

WRONG !!!! this isn't that far removed from some dingle headed legislator to proclaim that ALL sex is money induced (YES even in the confines of a marriage)thus we need taxation rights on any form of intercourse of a sexual nature.

First we have gun owners who believe the second amendment is about hunting, now we have a state that wants to tax a sexual business transaction between two private or three or more individuals. Whether it should be legal or not is NOT the issue here the FACT remains that Nevada creates a tourism source based on these houses being located in the state.

Friday, February 27, 2009

Nothing else need be said

There have been two letters written in response to the failure of the 1 cent sales tax proposal to shore up the police and fire pension fund that point a finger at the citizenry for either not understanding the proposal and the consequences if it didn't pass or for not being a caring and compassionate community, demonstrating disrespect for our fire and police forces. I want to assure Geoffrey Butler and James F. Miller that nothing could be further from the truth.

The Springfield News-Leader did a thorough and outstanding job informing the public on this issue. I attended every meeting at the newspaper held by Greg Burris, the citizen's group promoting the sales tax and a City Council representative, all in favor of the sales tax. I may not be the smartest person in attendance but it didn't take a rocket scientist to understand that the numbers were not accurate and the semantics used were just as misleading.

I want to assure Mr. Butler that his comments displayed blatant disrespect for the voters in the city of Springfield. Talking down to us and using bad grammar was downright rude and condescending. Living outside of Springfield does not entitle you to belittle our small town ways and values. Mr. Butler, if you feel so strongly about this issue and feel that we failed, I'm sure that Mr. Burris would welcome a check from you in support of this failed tax issue. He could plop it right into the fund and watch it grow, a percent here, a percent there ; it all adds up in the end.

Then you can have some "skin in the game."

Mr. Miller, insurance companies get their money one way or another. Again, I assure you the voters of Springfield were well informed and educated on this issue. ISO's were created for the purpose of creating a system to make money. If I were a police or fire person, I would not appreciate the comments alluding that because the sales tax didn't pass, this core group would not respond appropriately or in a timely manner. The individuals who work those aforementioned jobs made a choice just as you made a choice for your profession. We bear responsibility for choices.

I would like to remind Mr. Butler and Mr. Miller that the voters said no on Feb. 3 to the sales tax, sending a clear message demanding that the City Council and city manager become fiscally responsible. Until the three areas of the city - parks, City Utilities and City Council - learn to work together instead of independent of each other, there will be no financial resolution that is bankable. Any credit counselor will tell you that money problems are not fixed by more money ; it is fixed by managing what you have and utilizing better budget and spending options. We learn to live with "needs" not the "wants."

I stand by the work that the Springfield News-Leader performed on this issue and find their work stellar and unpretentious. The outcome of the vote does not dignify or justify all the criticisms that have been levied against them. Another slap in the face is from the city manager not accepting the vote and planning on placing it on the ballot again. As with a small child, no means no; and as with a small child, we will push and push to get our way.

It is very easy to criticize when you don't have "skin in the game." Move into the city limits then you will offer more than lip service to this issue.

J. Diane Richardson Springfield
J. Diane Richardson is a member of the News-Leader editorial advisory board. She lives in Springfield.

Friday, February 6, 2009

The cake never tasted so BITTER

Voters reject tax hike

Springfield city manager says "worst-case" plan will have to proceed.

Wes Johnson • News-Leader • February 4, 2009

Stung by tough economic times and mistrust of city leaders, Springfield voters narrowly rejected a one-cent sales tax to bolster the financially ailing police-fire pension fund Tuesday.

The pension sales tax -- which could have pumped an estimated $40 million a year into the fund for up to five years -- failed by fewer than 900 votes, according to final but unofficial results by the Greene County Clerk's office.

Had it passed, the tax would have gone into effect July 1 and would cost an extra dollar on a $100 purchase in Springfield.

At a gathering Tuesday night at the police and fire station on east Battlefield Road, City Manager Greg Burris said he would ask voters to reconsider the sales tax question, possibly in June or August.

And he said his "worst-case" budget plan -- which called for $5.7 million in cuts if the sales tax issue failed --will need to move ahead, even after a new council is elected in April.

"I won't change my budget recommendations based on who gets elected," Burris said. "The pension problem hasn't gone away."

Today, Burris plans to meet with his staff to figure out why voters rejected the sales tax and consider how the proposal might be "tweaked" ahead of another vote.

He said the pension fund's shortfall -- $197 million in December -- will continue to get worse because of the tax vote's failure, a sentiment echoed by Councilman Doug Burlison.

"My initial thought is that the price tag to fix this problem has just gone up, and gone up at an incredible rate," a visibly upset Burlison said. "I think, with all the problems the federal government is dealing with, that folks have equated this as being a local bailout. That's not a fair representation of the problem at all."

Mayor Tom Carlson said he thought getting a sales tax passed during the current economic recession "was going to be a challenge."

"The fact the vote came this close in this uncertain time is encouraging," he said.

Councilman Ralph Manley's voice cracked, and he wiped away a few tears, after the final results rolled in on a computer screen at the police-fire station on east Battlefield.

"I am very, very disappointed that only 17 percent of the people voted on this issue," Manley said. "In my own heart -- and I'm a successful businessman -- I knew this sales tax was the best way to get this done, and get it done quick."

City voter Charles Allen backed the sales tax because he wanted to show support for police officers and fire fighters.

"I'm retired myself," Allen said. "I know how much that pension would mean to them. These people deserve it. Nobody realizes the dangers they face. When the action starts, those people are out there putting their lives on the line for you."

He hoped voters would approve the tax, but indicated he wanted to see results with the new sales tax money.

"It's a shame we got in this situation," he said. "I hope they manage this thing right and give them what they deserve -- and give us what we deserve."

But Jay Rippee said the cost of a new sales tax was too much of a burden.

"With the economy's condition now, we shouldn't have a tax increase," Rippee said.

Asked if he felt the city successfully conveyed the need for the increase, Rippee said '"no."

"I don't think they gave us the reason for why it (the shortfall) happened in the first place," he said. "That was their fault and then we want to make it up now ..."

Judy Wilson said the city didn't do enough research before asking voters for a sales tax hike, and that earned a "no" vote from her.

She also felt the city resorted to "scare tactics" to sway voters by outlining budget cuts that could happen if the tax fails.

"I didn't like the scare tactics at all," she said. "A lot of older people my age are scared to death they're not going to have police protection if this fails. I don't think that's going to happen."

Fairelyn Bayless said she felt "really sorry for those guys" because of the losses in their pension fund.

"But I'm not going to vote for it unless I'm convinced all the money would go to the pension fund," she said. "I'm not sure it will."

Steven Reed, who formed an opposition group to the sales tax, said he thought the vote showed that "the city needs to start listening to its citizens."

A lot was riding on the outcome of Tuesday's vote, including the health of next year's city budget.

Burris has already presented a 17-point budget plan that would make deep cuts in some departments, extend a hiring freeze for 30 positions and possibly lay off some city employees.

It also eliminates all city financial support of nonprofit groups, and makes significant cuts in funding for the parks, public works and health departments.

How soon could the city legally put another sales tax issue on the ballot?

A Missouri Department of Revenue spokesman said June 2 would be the city's next opportunity to put the same sales tax proposal before Springfield voters.

However, Greene County Clerk Richard Struckhoff said the city potentially could seek a court order to get the question on the April 7 general election ballot.

Struckhoff said Jan. 27 was the filing deadline for the April 7 election. Only a court order could overrule that deadline, he said.

Saturday, January 31, 2009

reasons to say NO

Letter to the News-Leader Editor – for consideration:

Springfields’ Bond Rating scare

The newest “The sky will fall in if the citizens don’t approve our 1% tax proposal” line from our City Administration is that the City’s bond rating will go to pot, and it will be much more costly to carry out the capital project spending planned by the City.

People, the City Council and the Administration have a published 5-year capital program of items that they want to build that are projected to cost $1 billion dollars – just for construction costs. That’s ONE BILLION! Oh, yes, with that kind of spending, the City’s interest costs for all those projects will be drastically higher with any new and higher bond interest rate.

We have a Council and an Administration that really likes to spend on their Capital Improvement Projects. Spending when you have the money is fun. Spending, when you THINK you have the money, is the way to achieve certain bankruptcy.

Are all those Capital Improvement Projects really necessary? Does Springfield really need more park and greenway facilities and streetscapes now? Do we need to build more parking garages that cost more than they’re worth? How many dollars do we need to pump into “Downtown projects” to subsidize private developers? The City has shown no inclination to cut these projects in these tough times.

We, the taxpayers, are stuck with an Administration that has announced they will cut twenty-eight police positions as their first-round response to any “no” vote come February 3rd. This does say quite a bit in defining the Administration’s priorities.

James R. Hornaday, Jr.

Springfield

Friday, January 23, 2009

Restaurant fees all over again

Friday, June 15, 2007
KC loses appeal on fire inspection fees
Kansas City Business Journal

Kansas City's attempt to charge businesses and multifamily dwellings for fire inspections is unconstitutional, the Missouri Court of Appeals ruled this week.

In a 3-0 decision Tuesday, the court affirmed a lower court's ruling that the city's ordinances to charge as much as $100 per inspection and certification of compliance violated Missouri's Hancock Amendment because they imposed fees without voters' approval.

Alan Holtkamp, assistant city attorney for Kansas City, said Friday that the city was unsure whether it would appeal the ruling.

The fire department continues to perform inspections, but they're paid for out of the city's general fund.

That's also how the inspections were paid for before 2003. At the time, city officials looked at ways to raise revenue to support the fire department's work and passed the ordinance to mandate the inspection fees.

The Building Owners and Managers Association of Greater Kansas City filed a lawsuit against the city in 2004 in Jackson County Circuit Court.

While that case was pending, the city amended its ordinances to require a fire inspection with a fee of as much $100 or give building owners the option to have private engineers do the inspection and pay the city $10 for an inspection certificate.

The circuit court ruled in favor of the BOMA and ordered the city to repay all fees collected under the ordinances.

BOMA President Scott Du Vall couldn't be reached for comment.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Traffic-light cameras increase accidents, foster poor driving

Appeared in the Voices of the day column of the News Leader

Traffic-light cameras increase accidents, foster poor driving

Jason T. Umbarger • January 10, 2009

Numerous studies from academics, various departments of transportation, governments, insurance carriers and motorist advocacy groups clearly show the automated traffic camera systems present a threat to the safety of motorists.
Advertisement
Quantcast

I was surprised to find in my research that the automated enforcement is not an effective means to bring about a decrease in accidents. The most effective ways to prevent the classic T-bone accident the cameras purportedly prevent are an increase in yellow light times and larger traffic signals. The surveillance of intersections actually brings about an increase in accidents. Traffic is safest when it is most predictable and consistent. Some drivers behave differently when they become aware they are being surveilled. As a result, numerous studies have demonstrated the placement of cameras correlates with an increase in rear-end collision accidents. At the same time, the majority of traffic camera citations are for red-light runners who enter the intersection 0.1 seconds or thereabouts after the light turns red. T-bone collisions adhere to a profile featuring accidents far later following the red light. The lights are thus ineffective at reducing T-bone collisions and actually cause injuries and property damage from rear-end collision accidents.

While any given municipality may have been fortunate enough to experience a decrease in accidents, I would urge a closer examination of the statistics. We should keep in mind accidents and fatalities nationwide are down as a result of improvements in automotive safety, a period of increased gas prices (thus lower traffic numbers) and recession-related decreases in driving. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation as many municipalities would have us believe, particularly in the wake of a sea of academic rigor contrary to the city's contention that automated enforcement in any way improves motorist safety.

The motorists of Missouri deserve better. Missouri motorists deserve the protection of trained professional police officers to issue citations in a safe, prudent and humane way. Our motorists simply cannot be made to suffer the replacement of our policemen with robo-enforcement.

Jason T. Umbarger, MBA, JD is an attorney and lives in Springfield.